Determining Criteria Weights as a Function of Their Ranks in Multiple - Criteria Decision Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
The problem of assigning weights from ordinal ranks appears in many contexts in multi-criteria decision making. In this paper, we present an empirical methodology for converting an ordinal ranking of a number of criteria into numerical weights. Based on this methodology, the weight for each criterion is expressed as a simple mathematical function of its rank and the total number of criteria. The proposed methodology is empirically developed, evaluated, and validated based on a set of experiments involving university students and faculty members. The proposed method is compared with well-known methods in the literature and has shown superiority in assigning criteria weights from ordinal ranks.
منابع مشابه
Determining appropriate weight for criteria in multi criteria group decision making problems using an Lp model and similarity measure
Decision matrix in group decision making problems depends on a lot of criteria. It is essential to know the necessity ofweight or coefficient of each criterion. Accurate and precise selection of weight will help to achieve the intended goal.The aim of this article is to introduce a linear programming model for recognizing the importance of each criterion inmulti criteria group decision making w...
متن کاملMulti-criteria Logistic Hub Location by Network Segmentation under Criteria Weights Uncertainty (RESEARCH NOTE)
Third party service providers are locating logistic hub for operating their tasks. Finding a proper location helps them to have better performance in competitive environment. Multiple characteristics of proper location selection faces the decision maker to have a multi criteria decision making problem. Since the location decision is a long term planning, the robustness of the decision is gettin...
متن کاملRank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview
Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) refers to screening, prioritizing, ranking or selecting the alternatives based on human judgment from among a finite set of ` alternatives in terms of the multiple usually conflicting criteria. A very significant role in MCDM models plays the weights of criteria which usually provide the information about the relative importance of the considered criteria. S...
متن کاملThe Selection of Amine Solvent in Gas Treating Process Considering Physical and Process Criteria Using Multiple Criteria Decision-making Techniques: A Case Study of Ilam Gas Treating Company
In the current work, a framework is presented for amine solvent selection in gas treating process. Since the appropriate decision making in this field affects the capital and operational costs, multi attribute decision making (MADM) techniques were used to rank alternatives. The determination of criteria and alternatives is the most important aspect in the MADM. Criteria were divided into two c...
متن کاملSupplier selection with multi-criteria group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (case study on a project-based company)
Supplier selection can be considered as a complicated multi criteria decision-making problem.In this paper the problem of supplier selection is studied in the presence of conflicting evaluations and insufficient information about the criteria and different attitudes of decision makers towards the risk. Most of fuzzy approaches used in multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) are non-intuiti...
متن کامل